SoylentNews

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.slashgear.com/2282458/mit-research-digestible-bioresorbable-batteries/

Typically, swallowing a battery is an emergency, and one that can quickly turn fatal if left untreated. Between their caustic chemicals, damaging electrical current, and choking hazard, your average button battery (or even a AAA) can wreak havoc on the body, if ingested. A swallowed button battery can burn through a child's throat in as little as two hours, which is one reason those loose batteries sitting in a drawer could be a disaster waiting to happen.

However, there are also cutting-edge capsules designed to be swallowed. They can give doctors a thorough look at the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, control exactly when a drug is released, and transmit data to medical professionals from inside the body. However, they require power to work. Until now, these capsules have typically relied on wireless power from an external source or a tiny coin battery. The problem is that wireless power offers limited range, and even though coin batteries are coated for protection, they still pose a risk.

Fortunately, researchers at MIT have developed small batteries that swap out dangerous substances for magnesium and molybdenum trioxide, which the body can safely tolerate in small amounts. The paper-like battery produces 1.84 volts and uses an ionic liquid gel as its electrolyte. The entire battery is bioresorbable, meaning it can be fully broken down and absorbed by the body. It works for about three days before breaking down within weeks. So far, it's been tested on animals rather than humans. And this isn't the only progress being made with regard to powering medical devices, as there are new high-tech batteries that could theoretically last for thousands of years.

One area where this new battery has been tested is treating a symptom that plagues many people with serious diseases. Those diagnosed with cancer, HIV, dementia, or other serious conditions report a loss of appetite, which may also be a side effect of their medication. This can lead to rapid, unhealthy weight loss, along with low levels of essential nutrients. In severe cases, it can contribute to cachexia, a loss of body mass that can occur in patients with cancer or other chronic diseases.

[...] Another potential use for the bioresorbable battery is tracking medication. MIT researchers have been building radio frequency identification (RFID) tags into capsules, so medical professionals can confirm whether patients are taking their medication. As project leader Giovanni Traverso told Physics World, "Medication non-adherence remains a major cause of preventable morbidity and cost." The earlier version of this system relied on battery-free tags powered by harvested energy, which limited their range. With the new battery, the tag transmitted continuously from the GI tract at a range of up to nearly 5 feet (1.5 meters) in animal tests.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

Rocket Lab announced the Neutron rocket in 2021, aiming for a first flight in 2024:

Rocket Lab announced Wednesday that its Neutron launch vehicle won't fly until 2027, citing an issue discovered during manufacturing of the rocket's carbon composite structures.

The announcement was public confirmation of what nearly everyone inside Rocket Lab and the wider space industry already knew. The most recent official update from Rocket Lab in August suggested the company still held hope of delivering the first Neutron rocket to its launch pad at Wallops Island, Virginia, before the end of this year, a schedule that would have almost certainly pushed the first flight into 2027.

But Rocket Lab's statement Wednesday about Neutron's schedule suggests the company is still struggling with manufacturing the rocket's large booster stage. Neutron's reusable first stage is made of carbon composite structures, which offer low weight, high strength, and corrosion resistance. But carbon composites in aerospace are generally harder to manufacture than metallic structures.

Peter Beck, Rocket Lab's founder and CEO, identified a manufacturing defect as the reason for Neutron's latest schedule slip. The problem lies in the dome sections at the ends of the rocket's first stage propellant tanks.

"Recently, we identified an issue with the manufacturing process for the propellant domes specifically, and this caused us to delay production and investigate further," Beck said in a video released by Rocket Lab .

Engineers discovered voids, or air pockets, between layers of carbon fiber that make up the domes' composite structure. Carbon composite manufacturing involves laying down carbon fiber layers in a mold, then curing, or heating, the material to bind the fibers together. But this is a tricky process, especially for large structures that won't fit into an autoclave, a high-pressure thermal curing chamber common in modern aerospace factories.

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

AI's appetite for components hammers budget handsets, with analysts seeing little relief before 2028:

Smartphone shipments fell by at least a fifth in the third calendar quarter as the AI-driven memory crunch battered another consumer hardware market.

Preliminary estimates from IDC and Omdia put the year-on-year decline at 22 percent and 20 percent respectively.

Memory costs have surged by approximately 350 percent since last year, according to IDC, and are still rising. This continues to place substantial pressure on vendor margins, prompting them to hike price tags and scale back on devices at the value end of the market.

IDC estimates that vendors shipped 255.3 million smartphones into distribution channels and warns that the downturn is far from over.

"The sharp downturn the industry has been bracing for finally materialized in the third quarter this year. However, the worst is yet to come," said Nabila Popal, IDC's senior research director for worldwide devices.

"Current indicators suggest that the market has not yet reached the bottom. While memory inflation is beginning to slow down, with a low double-digit sequential increase in Q3 compared to a 50 to 100 percent jump in prior quarters, costs remain elevated across other critical components as well, compounding the crunch."

Omdia puts shipments at roughly 255 million, close to IDC's estimate despite the different annual decline.

It says that the shrinking market has further polarized the competitive landscape, with Samsung and Apple now accounting for about 45 percent of global shipments, up approximately 8 percentage points from a year ago, while rising costs hit more price-sensitive segments particularly hard.

cereal_burpist writes:

AI Researchers Are Smoking Cigarettes to Prove AI Will Cure Cancer, Says Palantir Exec

Notes upfront:

1. "He did not name a single researcher, cite a survey, or explain how he knows."
2. "Palantir sells data-analysis software to governments and militaries. Most of its business relies on AI."

Nothing says "I trust the future of medicine" quite like lighting a Marlboro and waiting for the chatbot to fix your lungs. That is the habit Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar says is spreading among AI researchers, who have supposedly started smoking cigarettes to prove how confident they are that AI will cure cancer.

"So many AI researchers have started smoking as a way of signaling to other researchers how much they believe in AI," Sankar said in an interview on CBS News' "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "I believe so much in AI that it's going to cure cancer. So I'm showing you my chips are all in."

He pointed to FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried as the effective altruist most Americans know, calling the movement a "millenarian doomsday cult." He also invoked Pascal's idea of a god-shaped hole in every human heart, which he suggested some of these researchers are filling with a machine god called AGI.

[...] (Facts & stats about 'smoking is bad', cancer, hatred for AI, etc)

So naturally, due to one-upmanship (aka human nature), next we'll hear that $AI-Corp is actively promoting unprotected sex and crack cocaine: Because AI will also cure HIV/AIDS and drug addiction! Imagine their next office holiday party...

Also, [solemn tone] I wish we could enjoy a comment from MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) about "millenarian doomsday cult." RIP, sir.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

Decades of cross-platform character corruption finally comes to an end for Windows coders:

After a week's delay, the new version of Python, v3.15, has been released. With it comes a proper profiler, an experimental just-in-time compiler, and a tightening of dictionary structures.  It also offers a time-saving Lazy Import option for programs to not load modules until needed, the implementation of which ironically halted this release until a few last-minute regressions were sorted.

But of all these new delicacies spread before the Pythonistas, the data wranglers of the bunch may most appreciate default UTF-8 support across all platforms. And when we say "all platforms," we're really just throwing shade at Windows (as usual). Python has defaulted to macOS and Linux Python environments for some time now. 

It's a small but important update. About half of all Python developers use the language for processing and analyzing data, and about 58 percent of Python users build on Windows, according to various Python Software Foundation surveys.

Earlier versions of Python defaulted to the host system's locale encoding. This led to much consternation for Windows developers whose scripts opened UTF-8-encoded data sets, only to have non-ASCII characters corrupt or crash the program. Culprits could be as innocuous as a smart quote or a fancy apostrophe.

Managed by The Unicode Consortium, with the help of the IETF and ISO, UTF-8 is an 8-bit binary encoding of the Unicode catalog of all the world's written symbols. ASCII offered only 128 characters to cover the world's knowledge, but UTF-8 provides over 1.1 million slots, which is plenty of room for smart quotes, emojis, musical and math notations, all the Chinese dialects, and even a few extinct languages (for research purposes).

There's also UTF-16 and UTF-32, but UTF-8's combination of efficiency and inclusiveness made it the default for the Web and most modern operating systems.

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.theregister.com/hpc/2026/10/15/partner-content-when-faster-supercomputers-arent-enough/5302562

When a million veterans shared their genetic data by enrolling in the Department of Veterans Affairs' "Million Veteran Program," they expected nothing back. This did not surprise Ravi Madduri, a senior scientist with the Data Science and Learning Division at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory. He is abundantly clear about the terms under which these veterans donated their data: "Even after giving everything to the country, they found it in their hearts to give more without expecting anything in return."

That gift, which constituted the nation's largest biorepository and most ancestrally varied cohorts of veteran data in the world, created a debt that Madduri, who also holds a joint appointment in the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Chicago, is working to repay.

"What I feel when I look at that data is that I have an obligation to deliver to the veterans on their intentions in doing this," he says. Those intentions, as he reads it, are that others, veteran or not, can benefit from whatever the data can reveal.

"We cannot dilly dally," Madduri says.

After arriving at Argonne as a graduate student in 2001, Madduri has spent the last two decades at the intersection of supercomputing and biomedicine, much of the time building the computing that turns the veterans' data into results impacting areas from post-traumatic stress disorder to heart disease to cancer.

He explains that machines have largely held up their end, but the obstacles between precious data and delivered results are not always solved with faster machines. Understanding the challenges is the path toward better science.

Any two human genomes differ at millions of specific positions. A genome-wide association study asks a seemingly simple question across an enormous volume of data. For example, does a given genetic variant travel together with a particular medical condition? On its own, the question is simple. Multiplied across every variant worth testing and every condition recorded in a patient's chart, it becomes an enormous math problem, which is what supercomputers exist to solve. The harder question is whether the code is written to let them.

Madduri's team has run this problem on the Summit system at DOE's Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility and on the Aurora system at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility. On Summit, the team found that the job would not finish on the machine's CPUs. As the cohort grew, the matrix the analysis needed for each group no longer fit in memory, and the job stalled.

"We decided to open the box and look at the code," Madduri said. They found that the issue was not merely a speed problem, but a coding one.

The analysis had been written for ordinary processors because that is what the genetics community was running on. Underneath the algorithms, though, the code spent nearly all of its time doing one thing: multiplying very large grids of numbers. This is exactly the operation that graphics processors exist to perform, and what makes them the engine of modern artificial intelligence training. As Madduri notes, the same computational architecture accelerating AI discovery "is also foundational for population genomics." So, the team, led on this effort by Argonne's Alex Rodriguez, rewrote that part of the code for GPUs, and an analysis that would have taken roughly 481,000 CPU-core hours in the original version became tractable. This shift did more than speed up a slow job. It made a virtually impossible job possible.

The workhorse they accelerated is a widely used genetics package called SAIGE, which made the rewritten version SAIGE-GPU, described in a separate paper in Bioinformatics.

"We are not good at coming up with names. Sorry," Madduri says sheepishly.

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/10/15/spyware-vendors-found-a-way-to-make-targeted-ads-even-worse/5303334

The online advertising industry has found a new way to make itself even more unpopular, with one adtech outfit accused of helping spyware vendors infect people's phones without them even clicking an ad.

Researchers at Citizen Lab say they've uncovered the first publicly confirmed case of a zero-click mercenary spyware attack being delivered through targeted online ads, with devices at Al Jazeera among those infected.

The technique, dubbed "AdFection," turns advertising networks into a spyware delivery system. Simply opening a website or app can be enough to trigger the attack, with no suspicious links or downloads involved.

Israeli adtech firm Discover-Tech is allegedly behind the operation, according to researchers at Citizen Lab, which says the company acts as a middleman between the online advertising industry and multiple spyware and hacking vendors.

"We present technical evidence that the Israel-based company Discover-Tech, while purporting to be a legitimate advertising company, appears to be a front for large-scale ad espionage abuse," the researchers wrote. "In fact, it appears that serving as this bridge is Discover-Tech's primary purpose."

Discover-Tech's Controlium platform exploits the real-time bidding system that decides which ads appear on websites and apps. Every time someone loads a page, advertisers compete for available ad space and, in the process, receive information about the user's device and location. Discover-Tech allegedly used that data to identify specific targets and serve them malicious ads. 

One spyware vendor linked to the operation is Candiru, the Israeli developer now known as Integrity Labs. Citizen Lab traced attacks against at least 45 devices at Al Jazeera in 2024 and 2025 to Candiru spyware delivered through ads from Discover-Tech.

Discover-Tech didn't have to sneak into the advertising system, as Google and IAB Europe had listed the company as an approved vendor since 2020, apparently unaware of what it was Citizen Lab claims it was doing with that access.

Citizen Lab sifted through nearly four billion ad-bidding records and found Discover-Tech ads on more than 70,000 mobile apps and 120,000 websites between March and June 2026.

Some reached networks belonging to government agencies, defense organizations, and NATO. Researchers found no evidence that those organizations were infected, but they say the ads could have been used to profile devices on those networks.

The researchers said the operation also covertly directed millions of devices toward servers associated with Candiru, although those connections don't necessarily indicate spyware infections.

Google has since terminated Discover-Tech's access to its advertising exchanges and removed it from its approved vendor lists. IAB Europe followed suit, while Beeswax, Vungle and Eskimi also took action.

Discover-Tech and Candiru did not respond to Citizen Lab's requests for comment, nor ours. 

The researchers argue that the findings expose serious failings in an advertising industry that allowed a company with links to commercial surveillance operators to operate inside its supposedly vetted ecosystem for years.

"Discover-Tech's mass abuse, privacy invasion, and facilitation for mercenary spyware attacks illustrates structural flaws with the online advertising system, which failed to detect or prevent the abuse documented in this report," Citizen Lab said.

For years, the worst thing about targeted advertising was that it knew far too much about you. Turns out some advertisers were interested in much more than your shopping habits.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.siliconrepublic.com/machines/meta-unveils-most-capable-us-open-weight-model-muse-spark-open

The multimodal model has 816bn total parameters, with 42bn active parameters and a 1m-token context window.

Meta has unveiled Muse Spark Open, calling it the “most capable” US open-weight model to date. The company said that the new model is the first in its class to be able to run on a desktop computer using Apple’s M5 Ultra Mac Studios with its latest machine learning framework.

The multimodal model has 816bn total parameters, with 42bn active parameters and a 1m-token context window. According to the company, it is built for coding, agentic work and other complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.

Unlike their closed weight contemporaries, developers can download parameters of an open weight model and modify them for their needs. Open weights, however, are not the same as open source models that also provide access to training data and code.

Meta said that the model weights are available for download via Amazon SageMaker AI, Google Cloud Model Garden, Hugging Face, and Microsoft Foundry Models. The model is available through popular API platforms including Groq, OpenRouter and Baseten.

China is by far the leader in the open-weights space, with models developed by Chinese makers such as Xiaomi, Z AI, Kimi, Alibaba and DeepSeek routinely ranking above their US counterparts in Artificial Analysis ranking.

Muse Spark Open has had additional post-training safety, the company said. It evaluated the model across its “most severe risks” and found that it met the thresholds set by Meta.

Open weight models are considered necessary for AI leadership, as being able to tweak a model means organisations, from start-ups to public institutions can build on advanced models without training one from scratch.

Earlier this month, France’s AI darling Mistral announced its latest open-weight AI model Mistral Large 4, which it said “significantly outperforms” any open-weight model developed in the US or Europe.

Known as ‘Le Chonk’, ML4 is a 1trn-parameter natively multimodal model with 49bn active parameters, and Mistral’s “largest and most capable model to date”.

Original Submission

owl writes:

https://www.righto.com/2026/10/8087-addition-subtraction-microcode.html

In this article, I examine the 8087's microcode and circuitry to explain exactly how floating-point addition and subtraction are implemented, including numerous special cases for infinities and other special values.

...

The key component is the integer adder, located in the center. It receives one argument from the B register and another argument from a component such as the temporary registers or the stack registers. The adder's output is stored in the sum register. The shifter can shift the bits in a value to the left or the right. The shifter occupies a lot of space on the die because its circuitry allows a value to be rapidly shifted by an arbitrary number of bits. Floating-point operations make heavy use of the shifter to align values; the leading zero circuitry counts the number of zero bits or bytes on the left of a value so they can be shifted away. The exponent converter processes exponents, detecting overflows and underflows. These specialized circuits helped the 8087 achieve its high performance.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/10/15/researchers-warned-attackers-could-defrost-the-food-months-before-french-supermarkets-got-hit/5303425

Security researchers warned about exploitable vulnerabilities in refrigeration controllers months - and in one case, more than a year - before cyberattacks disrupted hundreds of French supermarkets.

Late Sunday night, unknown criminals hacked thousands of controllers, cranking the heat as high as 122°F (50°C), spoiling food and sparking fires across nearly 700 of the country's supermarkets.

France's national cybersecurity agency ANSSI on Monday warned of widespread compromises involving Danfoss refrigeration controllers, and a day later added affected systems from Copeland and its Dixell brand. The compromised devices were accessible over the internet, with many reportedly no longer receiving software or security updates and others running outdated firmware.

Danfoss did not immediately respond to The Register's request for comment. Copeland emailed us the following statement: 

"We acknowledge the vulnerability identified in a discontinued, end-of-life generation of controllers. Protecting our customers' operations has always been a top priority. We are currently working with impacted customers to mitigate the risk. We will continue to support customers in strengthening cybersecurity through supported products, current software and industry-recommended practices."

Operational technology (OT) security firm Claroty's Team82 sounded the alarm on these buggy devices in August, warning that hackers could "freeze the controller" and "defrost the food." At the time, the researchers published details of dozens of vulnerabilities, including authentication bypass and operating-system command execution flaws, affecting Danfoss AK-SM 800A and Copeland XWEB controllers.

Even earlier, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) published advisories about security flaws in both brands' controllers. 

In February, CISA said nearly two dozen CVEs in Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro could be exploited to  "allow an attacker to bypass authentication, cause a denial-of-service condition, cause memory corruption, and execute arbitrary code."

In a May 2025 advisory, updated in August 2025, CISA published a similar warning about buggy Danfoss AK-SM 8xxA series devices.

"What makes this incident particularly striking is the timeline," Tiago Henriques, chief underwriting officer at cyber insurance provider Coalition, told The Register. He noted that the French supermarket hacks happened two months after Team82 published its research, and Danfoss released a firmware update (R4.3.1) to mitigate the flaws.

"Yet, despite the availability of these patches, Coalition's scanning identified critical exposure to these threats continuing well into the fall," Henriques said. 

Between September 7 and October 6, Coalition's sensors identified 1,506 unique IP addresses still publicly exposing a Danfoss StoreView web-accessible admin panel, and 820 of these - 54 percent - were associated with French networks. 

"Our scans counted at least 2,624 refrigeration controllers from the named brands with a login page open to the internet: 1,506 Danfoss StoreView and 1,119 XWEB," he added, noting that one IP runs both types of controllers.

To be clear: this doesn't mean all of these controllers were vulnerable, but rather they were exposed to the open internet.

Even after the cyberattacks - as of Thursday - 618 Danfoss devices remain connected to the internet, according to the insurance provider's count. Of these, 206 are connected to French networks, while 50 are in the US, and two in the UK.

"An unpatched device featuring a web-accessible admin panel can act as a major entry point" for digital attackers, Henriques said. "The takeaway is clear: digital risk extends far beyond workstations and email servers."

Criminals are targeting OT and other industrial devices that are connected to the internet, too. 

"Identifying these exposed access points before they are targeted can directly contribute to preserving business continuity," Henriques said.

In America, a group of OT cybersecurity and technology providers doubled down on their call for stronger food and agriculture protections in the US. The French cyberattacks "are another stark reminder of the importance of implementing baseline cybersecurity measures to enhance operational technology cybersecurity," the Operational Technology Cybersecurity Coalition (OTCC) said in a Wednesday statement.

Earlier this month, the group, whose members include Claroty, Forescout, Honeywell, and Schneider Electric, called on CISA to issue a Binding Operational Directive to improve OT cybersecurity within the federal government. The OTCC repeated this demand on Wednesday and suggested that the US Department of Agriculture could encourage organizations in the food and agriculture sector to implement cybersecurity best practices.

"While no incidents have been reported in the United States, malicious actors are undoubtedly viewing this incident as a potential attack vector to perform here," the statement said. "We cannot wait for that to happen."

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.cnet.com/science/world-timekeepers-kill-the-leap-second/

Human timekeeping rests on two main clocks, and they don't always run at the same speed. For decades, the solution was the leap second, a minor adjustment added to international time to keep atomic accuracy aligned with the Earth’s natural motion. But on Thursday, the General Conference on Weights and Measures, or the CGPM (abbreviated from its French name), voted to abolish the leap second, closing a long-standing chapter in global time sync.

Most modern clocks rely on Coordinated Universal Time, a hybrid system caught between atomic time, which flows at a near-perfectly constant rate, and astronomical time, which fluctuates as the Earth’s rotation speeds up and slows down. To bridge the gap, UTC periodically inserted a leap second to keep pace with the planet. But reconciling physical planetary shifts with precise digital systems ultimately created more technical disruptions than it solved.

Computers are sensitive when it comes to timekeeping. The last few times we added a leap second to UTC — in 2012, 2015 and 2016 – some computer systems couldn't handle it. Of the three instances, 2012 was the worst, as adding a leap second caused issues that crashed websites and software platforms, such as Reddit, LinkedIn and Mozilla.

The speed of Earth's rotation experiences small changes all the time. While we can't predict exactly how fast Earth will rotate in the future, the conference wrote that there's a 30% chance we'll have to add a negative leap second by 2035 to keep UTC aligned with rotational time.

If adding a regular leap second was trouble, imagine what adding a negative leap second could do. The conference doesn't want to risk finding out. So, potential future computer anomalies caused by UTC changes are a major reason why the leap second is going away.

"Industrial users and the synchronization needs of national critical infrastructures, for example, transportation, energy distribution, telecommunication, and space projects, require UTC to be continuous without any future adjustment," the group’s resolution reads.

The official death of the leap second will be May 20, 2027, when continuous UTC becomes effective. A continuous UTC means that no more leap seconds, negative or otherwise, will be added to UTC going forward. This also means that UTC and rotational time will begin to drift apart.

The CGPM noted that allowing time measurements to differ by up to an hour will keep UTC stable for several centuries.

This means in the future, when it's noon, the sun might not be at its highest in the sky. But, considering we've only added 27 leap seconds since the concept was introduced in 1972, any changes that occur within our lifetimes will probably be very small.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.theregister.com/paas-and-iaas/2026/10/14/us-tech-giants-warn-europe-that-ditching-us-tech-giants-could-cost-115b/5303031

Some of America's biggest tech companies have a warning for Europe: curb your reliance on US cloud providers, and it could cost you €115 billion.

That's the finding of a new study commissioned by CCIA Europe, a lobbying group whose members include Amazon, Google, and Meta, companies that have plenty of reasons to want European governments to keep buying American cloud services.

The research, conducted by the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), claims the European Commission's proposed Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) could saddle Europe with €115 billion in costs over the next decade, more than six times the Commission's upper estimate of €18 billion.

The report argues that restrictions favoring European cloud providers would leave governments and businesses facing hefty bills to migrate workloads and rewrite software. It puts direct public-sector costs at €33.3 billion, with a further €80 billion potentially falling on private companies in sectors including banking, healthcare, energy, and transport.

However, a rather large asterisk is attached to that €80 billion figure. It assumes the Commission extends sovereignty requirements beyond public procurement to cover 25 percent of cloud workloads in essential private-sector industries. In other words, it's a modeled scenario, not a bill Brussels has already handed European businesses.

The study also comes with some baggage of its own. CCIA represents several US technology giants that dominate the European cloud market, including Amazon and Google. Both have spent years selling European customers cloud services while more recently developing sovereign cloud offerings designed to address concerns about foreign ownership, data access, and regulatory control.

Amazon, for example, has been developing its AWS European Sovereign Cloud, while Google markets a range of sovereign cloud solutions. Apparently, sovereignty is an attractive proposition when it comes with a hyperscaler logo attached. Meta, another CCIA member, has its own interests in European AI infrastructure, although it is not a commercial cloud provider on the scale of AWS or Google Cloud.

The report specifically targets Article 31 of the proposed legislation, which it says could allow the Commission to extend sovereignty requirements into essential private-sector services. CCIA argues that forcing businesses to move away from existing cloud infrastructure could trigger expensive software redevelopment projects, with code rewriting and re-architecting accounting for 69 percent of its estimated costs.

Luxembourg would apparently take the biggest hit, with the study putting the cost at €1,711 per worker over ten years. Denmark (€905), Austria (€900), and Finland (€864) also face hefty bills, as does Ireland (€856), which hosts the European headquarters of several US tech giants.

CCIA is urging EU governments to overhaul the proposed legislation, limit sovereignty restrictions to sensitive workloads, and abandon requirements based on corporate origin or personnel nationality in favor of what it calls risk-based technical safeguards.

"Member States cannot rely on the Commission's incomplete estimates when deciding CADA's strict sovereignty requirements for cloud and AI providers," said Mitchell Rutledge, CCIA Europe's policy manager. "Taxpayers and businesses will foot the bill, yet the official assessment missed 70 percent of CADA's true impact."

For AWS and Google, offering European customers greater control over their data also helps retain business that might otherwise migrate to European competitors. It's a rather convenient arrangement: sell customers sovereignty on one hand, while an industry association representing your interests warns governments against imposing too much of it on the other.

Neither company responded to The Register's questions. 

Whether Europe's sovereignty ambitions will prove as expensive as CCIA predicts is unclear. What's easier to establish is that the companies warning Brussels about the cost of reducing its dependence on US technology have plenty to gain if Europe decides to keep buying American.

Original Submission

quietus writes:

The Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit EU has ended in Prague.

The Register has a good writeup -- with extensive links -- about the two focal points of the summit, AI and Digital Sovereignty.

Apart from that, it is well worth a quick rifling through the other Summit presentations, for example the Siemens' presentation "Triaging CVEs for the Linux Kernel". One takeaway there is that something must have happened around 2020. While 200-300 CVEs were kinda the norm before, in 2021 the number of CVEs jumped five-fold, doubling again in 2022 and so on until we ended up with 6317 CVEs for 2026, to date.

Something happened, but what?

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.theregister.com/systems/2026/10/14/new-motherboards-old-ram-plenty-of-life-left-in-yesterdays-pcs/5303018

Gigabyte recently announced new motherboards that use DDR4 RAM, a standard that launched in 2014, and other vendors support even older standards in brand-new kit.

Earlier this year, AMD released a Ryzen 7 5800X3D anniversary edition to mark ten years of AM4. For AM4 processors, Gigabyte offers the new B450M H ARGB, with two DDR4 slots, and the B550 X-Eagle with four slots. Those who prefer Intel chippery can now buy a B760M Aorus Elite.

This is notable because of the age of the DDR4 spec. In case you lose track of these things, The Register first described the new DDR4 spec back in 2012, and a few months later urged the keen to wait a year or two.

DDR5 supports higher transfer rates, and The Reg predicted its arrival in 2017. The DDR5 standard was agreed in 2020, with mainstream PC adoption following in 2021.

Over in the People's Republic of China, several vendors will sell you new DDR3 motherboards for 15-year-old server CPUs, such as Huananzhi's X79-4D or X79 Supreme, or the Machinist X79 V2.82H. These use Intel's LGA-2011 socket – named for the number of pins, but coincidentally launched in 2011. This Chinese SMZDM community discussion is about whether the circa 15-year-old Xeon E5 is still worth buying – a CPU The Reg covered in 2012.

This is partly due to the current price rises and component shortages induced by large-scale, cloud-based LLMs –  but also "training" those "open-weight" models that run on your own kit. Those too are constructed in giant datacenters stuffed full of GPUs, ingesting all the human-written material they can get their hands on, rarely asking for consent. And not just stuff put online either.

Once you wipe the sluggish, bloated commercial OS from your computer's storage, you discover two things. First, you don't need the latest hardware any more. Secondly, the older the PC (or Mac), the better the chances that it will work fine with Linux – or indeed the other FOSS OSes out there.

Current and recent hardware is the most problematic for FOSS developers because most manufacturers prioritize Windows testing, while restricted documentation and proprietary drivers can complicate open source support for new hardware. Together, these things mean that if you're happy without high-powered local LLMs, or three-digit frame rates, second-hand kit is more usable than ever.

(For those who can't do without one or two Windows-only apps that won't run under Wine, we remind you that desktop VMware is free now... and for better desktop integration, we looked at WinApps and WinBoat earlier this year.)

The Reg FOSS desk is based in the British Isles, close enough to order stuff inexpensively from the UK. We've been using online vendors of depreciated ex-corporate kit for decades: we've bought several machines from Morgan Computers, and occasionally from Tier1 Online and Bargain Hardware. Other vendors are available. There are also special-purpose price-comparison sites, such as LowCostMiniPCs.com, which searches other sales sites for bargains.

When we were based in Czechia, we bought a few things from GigaComputer, and we know of others we didn't try, such as Refurbed.cz. Other such European sites include Computershop.eu.

The usability of kit that can only officially run Windows 10 was the entire point of the End of 10 campaign. Microsoft cites security benefits for Windows 11's hardware requirements, but in this vulture's opinion, those benefits don't justify excluding an entire generation of otherwise capable hardware.

Keeping older hardware in service is welcome. If digital sovereignty gives organizations another reason to consider open source alternatives, so much the better.

Original Submission

"Arthur T Knackerbracket" writes:

https://www.slashgear.com/2282678/us-nhtsa-headlight-brightness-glare-rule-change-plans/

Motorists have relied on automotive headlights for well over a century, with the first being acetylene gas lamps equipped on early versions of the Model T. In the years since, several advancements have transformed headlights, bringing about lighting technology like Halogen, HID(Xenon), and LED.

High intensity headlights are considered by some to be among the worst car trends we've ever seen. In the case of LEDs specifically, many are finding them far too bright. Members of AAA have been vocal for years about their disdain for LED headlights, and a petition on Change.org to "Ban Blinding Headlights and Save Lives!" have garnered well over 80,000 signatures.

Those struggling against the glare of LED beams aren't imagining it, these headlights are brighter, and feature a greater concentration of light than previous technologies. You can employ a little-known trick that can reduce glare from LED headlights, but it doesn't entirely solve the problem. In addition, the blue wavelength the LEDs produce can be especially hard on the eyes. Not only are many calling the situation unsafe due to extensive glare, it's also unclear at this time whether these LED headlights are potentially causing damage to people's retinas through extended exposure.

Finally, surely to many Americans' relief, the U.S. Department of Transportation signaled it's move to investigate and modernize regulations surrounding the LED headlight situation. In an update to the existing Federal Standard 108, the agency will reportedly study the relationship between headlight focus, height and glare, reexamine regulation around LEDs as well as more recent automatic and light sensor features. Jonathan Morrison, NHTSA Administrator promised in a NHTSA press release to "address [the] potential causes of glare," and "to update outdated regulations..."

More common in Europe, there is a technology called matrix headlights that contain many micro-LEDs spaced across a surface. In the Digital Matrix system by Audi, are each thinner than a human hair. With the help of tiny cpu chips and mirrors, these thousands of micro-LEDs selectively form patterns to focus light more intelligently at the road and actively away from other motorists. The video clip shows this technology in action, as an Audi with the Digital Matrix system selectively clicks off light pointed at an approaching driver, and then turns it back on after the vehicle passes.

Other countries in the world have been using these advanced headlights for years, so why not the states? The first issue was Federal Standard 108 instituted by the NHTSA back in the late 1960's – the same one the government is looking to update today. The rule deemed that high and low beams must be powered with different bulbs. Because matrix headlights utilize the same array of micro-LEDs for high and low beam functions, they were effectively illegal in the U.S.

This high and low beam rule was amended in 2022, but it didn't make the situation better. Even though the language in Federal Standard 108 was updated, it ended up making requirements even more stringent than rules in place across the ocean in Europe, requiring those matrix headlight systems to be reengineered for American cars. So, automakers just turned off the adaptive headlight features in the U.S. entirely.

Original Submission